Credit: Courtesy of Claremont Graduate University

Carl Cohn, executive managing director of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence

Credit: Courtesy of Claremont Graduate University

Carl Cohn, executive director of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence

Carl Cohn
June three, 2015

Now that the recent school board elections are over in the Los Angeles Unified Schoolhouse District, at that place will be the usual calls for a new start and getting down to the serious business of charting a bright future for the 600,000 or so deserving students that the board is privileged to serve.

Such a view ignores the fact that LAUSD'southward governance construction is fundamentally cleaved and needs to be replaced by smaller units of school governance that are much more capable of delivering educational change that better serves students and their parents. In add-on to being nimble and flexible, smaller schoolhouse districts are physically closer to the parents they serve, and can initiate modify strategies in a much more timely fashion. For example, Long Beach Unified, Garden Grove Unified and ABC Unified are all known equally urban districts that tin can move apace to implement needed changes that parents care about.

X years ago, while a faculty member at the Academy of Southern California, I served as the federal court monitor for the Modified Consent Decree, the blueprint for improving services to students with disabilities in the behemoth district.

During moments of frustration with the commune's intransigence, I would sometimes say to the mettlesome disability advocate lawyers representing the plaintiffs that I had a tough fourth dimension figuring out how students and their parents benefited from maintaining the district at its current size, and that breaking it upwards into smaller units would improve serve students' interests.

They would speedily counter: "Now, Carl, if you lot broke information technology upwards, you lot'd go a lot of Comptons or Inglewoods, which might exist fifty-fifty worse than what you're getting at present." And I'd came back with: "You lot might also get some Long Beaches, which would be a vast improvement over what these kids and parents are getting now."

The argument for breakup becomes even stronger today when yous consider the important equity promise of Gov. Jerry Brown's remarkable LCFF/LCAP school funding reform initiative, which places even greater authority at the local level to go things right for kids. When Los Angeles Unified screws up, more than one-half a 1000000 California youngsters are denied a critical opportunity to get a decent education during their 1 shot at using education to change their life chances.

The missteps of the district are legion – everything from expensive attorneys arguing for the district that a middle school pupil was mature enough to consent to accept sex with a teacher to the billion-dollar iPAD and MiSiS engineering debacles and school board elections where records have been broken for adult special-interest-group spending.

No single effect meliorate captures the failure of this system than the recent revelation that 75 percent of the current class of 2022 is not on target to meet the schoolhouse board'due south 2005 adopted policy requirement that all students must meet UC/CSU A-Yard higher archway requirements in order to receive a loftier school diploma. For urban school boards, in that location'south more to policymaking than adopting well-intentioned college standards. An important part of the chore is to make sure that staff develops timely implementation plans without waiting ten years to check progress. No matter how much nosotros adults may wish information technology so, not all youngsters need to get to college.

Urban schoolhouse boards like Los Angeles need to first evangelize on the basics earlier they start adopting high schoolhouse graduation requirements that are higher than those in the Palos Verdes and Palo Alto schoolhouse systems. Last October, y'all had students at Jefferson High Schoolhouse still walking the halls and in auditoriums without scheduled classes even though school had started back on Aug. 12. Even worse, you had a superintendent giving a deposition in court (Cruz v. California) that he was powerless to get these students scheduled in the right classes, and that he needed assistance from the State of California to become this bones responsibility done.

I often wonder how the Long Beach school community would react to school starting in August and high school kids even so without classes in October. I know from experience that there would exist a universal and commonage sense of community outrage and expose that no schoolhouse board or superintendent could survive.

The Los Angeles schoolhouse system has fundamentally lost its way, and the notion that a couple of new faces on the lath and a skillful interim superintendent, Ray Cortines, can improve it is a huge disservice to the youngsters and their parents who deserve much ameliorate.

A blue ribbon chore force with representation from the more than xx cities served past the current district might be the best way to get. In the past, the strongest statement against breakup was that you would end up with new racially segregated districts. Today'south demographics make that a weak argument. On the other hand, Gov. Brown'due south belief that the rescue of urban kids volition take place closer to schools, classrooms and families bolsters the case for this type of alter.

Breaking it upwards won't be easy, and I'grand sure that Sacramento doesn't have this on its "to practice" listing, but we who abet for teaching change often frame the argue every bit those who are committed to the adult condition quo against those who are really for the kids. This will exist the ultimate examination of where we stand.

Carl Cohn is Director of the Urban Leadership Programme at Claremont Graduate University and until earlier this yr was a member of the State Board of Education. He was formerly superintendent in Long Beach Unified and San Diego Unified.  He is co-chair of the  National Research Council's Commission for the Five-Year Evaluation of the Washington D.C. Public Schools.  He is a fellow member of the EdSource Board of Directors.

The opinions expressed in this commentary represent solely those of the author. EdSource welcomes commentaries representing diverse points of view. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource'due south no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.